1449: Thomas Massie – Big Government vs. Big Business

The big difference between big government and big business is big government can take you to jail, or shoot you if you don't comply. —Thomas Massie
Normal Quality (1920×1005 204 KB)
The big difference between big government and big business is big government can take you to jail, or shoot you if you don't comply. —Thomas Massie
Normal Quality (1920×1372 276 KB)
The big difference between big government and big business is big government can take you to jail, or shoot you if you don't comply. —Thomas Massie
The big difference between big government and big business is big government can take you to jail, or shoot you if you don't comply. —Thomas Massie

The big difference between big government and big business is big government can take you to jail, or shoot you if you don’t comply. —Thomas Massie

1448: Shane Hazel – I’m Very Pro-Life

Personally, I'm very pro-life, but I don't think it's a good idea to take money through force and coercion to fund things that are against people's conscience whether they're pro-life or pro-choice. —Shane Hazel
Normal Quality (1920×1005 221 KB)
Personally, I'm very pro-life, but I don't think it's a good idea to take money through force and coercion to fund things that are against people's conscience whether they're pro-life or pro-choice. —Shane Hazel
Normal Quality (1920×1372 274 KB)
Personally, I'm very pro-life, but I don't think it's a good idea to take money through force and coercion to fund things that are against people's conscience whether they're pro-life or pro-choice. —Shane Hazel
Personally, I'm very pro-life, but I don't think it's a good idea to take money through force and coercion to fund things that are against people's conscience whether they're pro-life or pro-choice. —Shane Hazel

Personally, I’m very pro-life, but I don’t think it’s a good idea to take money through force and coercion to fund things that are against people’s conscience whether they’re pro-life or pro-choice. —Shane Hazel

1445: Bob Murphy: Discrimination in the Free Market

If an employer has an opening that pays $50,000 in salary, and the Christian applicant will bring in $51,000 in extra revenue to the firm while the Muslim applicant will bring in $55,000, then to discriminate against the creed of the latter will cost the employer $4,000 in potential profits. Discrimination is automatically “fined” in the free market. — Bob Murphy
Normal Quality (3840×2010 118 KB)
If an employer has an opening that pays $50,000 in salary, and the Christian applicant will bring in $51,000 in extra revenue to the firm while the Muslim applicant will bring in $55,000, then to discriminate against the creed of the latter will cost the employer $4,000 in potential profits. Discrimination is automatically “fined” in the free market. — Bob Murphy
Normal Quality (3840×3840 152 KB)
If an employer has an opening that pays $50,000 in salary, and the Christian applicant will bring in $51,000 in extra revenue to the firm while the Muslim applicant will bring in $55,000, then to discriminate against the creed of the latter will cost the employer $4,000 in potential profits. Discrimination is automatically “fined” in the free market. — Bob Murphy
If an employer has an opening that pays $50,000 in salary, and the Christian applicant will bring in $51,000 in extra revenue to the firm while the Muslim applicant will bring in $55,000, then to discriminate against the creed of the latter will cost the employer $4,000 in potential profits. Discrimination is automatically “fined” in the free market. — Bob Murphy

If an employer has an opening that pays $50,000 in salary, and the Christian applicant will bring in $51,000 in extra revenue to the firm while the Muslim applicant will bring in $55,000, then to discriminate against the creed of the latter will cost the employer $4,000 in potential profits. Discrimination is automatically “fined” in the free market. — Bob Murphy

1444: Johnny Adams – Censorship is About Control

Censorship is really about the state being afraid of the ideas of liberty; they're afraid that it might catch on and that they will lose all control. —Johnny Adams
Normal Quality (1920×1005 313 KB)
Censorship is really about the state being afraid of the ideas of liberty; they're afraid that it might catch on and that they will lose all control. —Johnny Adams
Normal Quality (1920×1372 412 KB)
Censorship is really about the state being afraid of the ideas of liberty; they're afraid that it might catch on and that they will lose all control. —Johnny Adams
Censorship is really about the state being afraid of the ideas of liberty; they're afraid that it might catch on and that they will lose all control. —Johnny Adams

Censorship is really about the state being afraid of the ideas of liberty; they’re afraid that it might catch on and that they will lose all control. —Johnny Adams

1440: Ludwig von Mises – The Worship of the State

The worship of the state is the worship of force. —Ludwig von Mises
Download Print Quality (3840×2010 1 MB)  |  Normal Quality (1920×1005 165 KB)
The worship of the state is the worship of force. —Ludwig von Mises
Download Print Quality (3840×2743 2 MB)  |  Normal Quality (1920×1372 192 KB)
The worship of the state is the worship of force. —Ludwig von Mises
The worship of the state is the worship of force. —Ludwig von Mises

The worship of the state is the worship of force. —Ludwig von Mises

1439: Derek Wills – The Prohibition of Narcotics

The prohibition and control of narcotics have only led to even more detrimental consequences than before the state's involvement. —Derek Wills
Download Print Quality (3840×2010 2 MB)  |  Normal Quality (1920×1005 195 KB)
The prohibition and control of narcotics have only led to even more detrimental consequences than before the state's involvement. —Derek Wills
Download Print Quality (3840×2743 3 MB)  |  Normal Quality (1920×1372 251 KB)
The prohibition and control of narcotics have only led to even more detrimental consequences than before the state's involvement. —Derek Wills
The prohibition and control of narcotics have only led to even more detrimental consequences than before the state's involvement. —Derek Wills

The prohibition and control of narcotics have only led to even more detrimental consequences than before the state’s involvement. —Derek Wills

1434: Walter Block – A Tax-Collecting Government

...to argue that a tax-collecting government can legitimately protect its citizens against aggression is to contradict oneself, since such an entity starts off the entire process by doing the very opposite of protecting those under its control. —Walter Block
Download Print Quality (3840×2010 4 MB)  |  Normal Quality (1920×1005 281 KB)
...to argue that a tax-collecting government can legitimately protect its citizens against aggression is to contradict oneself, since such an entity starts off the entire process by doing the very opposite of protecting those under its control. —Walter Block
Download Print Quality (3840×2743 6 MB)  |  Normal Quality (1920×1372 379 KB)
...to argue that a tax-collecting government can legitimately protect its citizens against aggression is to contradict oneself, since such an entity starts off the entire process by doing the very opposite of protecting those under its control. —Walter Block
...to argue that a tax-collecting government can legitimately protect its citizens against aggression is to contradict oneself, since such an entity starts off the entire process by doing the very opposite of protecting those under its control. —Walter Block

…to argue that a tax-collecting government can legitimately protect its citizens against aggression is to contradict oneself, since such an entity starts off the entire process by doing the very opposite of protecting those under its control. —Walter Block

1427: Lysander Spooner – Money in the Hands of Government

Every man who puts money into the hands of a "government," puts into its hands a sword which will be used against himself, to extort more money from him, and also to keep him in subjection to its arbitrary will. —Lysander Spooner
Normal Quality (1920×1005 181 KB)
Every man who puts money into the hands of a "government," puts into its hands a sword which will be used against himself, to extort more money from him, and also to keep him in subjection to its arbitrary will. —Lysander Spooner
Normal Quality (1920×1372 235 KB)
Every man who puts money into the hands of a "government," puts into its hands a sword which will be used against himself, to extort more money from him, and also to keep him in subjection to its arbitrary will. —Lysander Spooner
Every man who puts money into the hands of a "government," puts into its hands a sword which will be used against himself, to extort more money from him, and also to keep him in subjection to its arbitrary will. —Lysander Spooner

Every man who puts money into the hands of a “government,” puts into its hands a sword which will be used against himself, to extort more money from him, and also to keep him in subjection to its arbitrary will. —Lysander Spooner

1425: Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn – A State of War

A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. —Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Normal Quality (1920×1005 142 KB)
A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. —Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Normal Quality (1920×1372 177 KB)
A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. —Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. —Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. —Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

1421: Lysander Spooner – Government and the Robber

The robber does not pretend to be anything but a robber. Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do. He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful "sovereign," on account of the "protection" he affords you.

He does not keep "protecting" you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands. —Lysander Spooner
Download Print Quality (3840×2010 233 KB)  |  Normal Quality (3840×2010 119 KB)
The robber does not pretend to be anything but a robber. Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do. He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful "sovereign," on account of the "protection" he affords you.

He does not keep "protecting" you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands. —Lysander Spooner
Download Print Quality (3073×3840 312 KB)  |  Normal Quality (3073×3840 159 KB)
The robber does not pretend to be anything but a robber. Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do. He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful "sovereign," on account of the "protection" he affords you.

He does not keep "protecting" you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands. —Lysander Spooner
The robber does not pretend to be anything but a robber. Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do. He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful "sovereign," on account of the "protection" he affords you.

He does not keep "protecting" you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands. —Lysander Spooner

The robber does not pretend to be anything but a robber. Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do. He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful “sovereign,” on account of the “protection” he affords you.

He does not keep “protecting” you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands. —Lysander Spooner