1450: Bob Murphy – Free to Argue for Any Viewpoint

People should be legally free to argue for any viewpoint, no matter how “obviously” false and even reprehensible, in order to protect society from being enslaved to a popular but untrue belief. ―Robert P. MurphyDownload Print Quality (3840×2010) 4.87MB  |  Normal Quality (1920×1005) 237KB
People should be legally free to argue for any viewpoint, no matter how “obviously” false and even reprehensible, in order to protect society from being enslaved to a popular but untrue belief. ―Robert P. MurphyDownload Print Quality (3840×2744) 6.58MB  |  Normal Quality (1920×1372) 305KB

People should be legally free to argue for any viewpoint, no matter how “obviously” false and even reprehensible, in order to protect society from being enslaved to a popular but untrue belief. ―Robert P. Murphy

1449: Thomas Massie – Big Government vs. Big Business

The big difference between big government and big business is big government can take you to jail, or shoot you if you don't comply. —Thomas MassieDownload Print Quality (3840×2010) 3.16MB  |  Normal Quality (1920×1005) 204KB
The big difference between big government and big business is big government can take you to jail, or shoot you if you don't comply. —Thomas MassieDownload Print Quality (3840×2744) 4.16MB  |  Normal Quality (1920×1372) 276KB

The big difference between big government and big business is big government can take you to jail, or shoot you if you don’t comply. —Thomas Massie

1448: Shane Hazel – I’m Very Pro-Life

Personally, I'm very pro-life, but I don't think it's a good idea to take money through force and coercion to fund things that are against people's conscience whether they're pro-life or pro-choice. —Shane HazelDownload Print Quality (3840×2010)   |  Normal Quality (1920×1005) 221KB
Personally, I'm very pro-life, but I don't think it's a good idea to take money through force and coercion to fund things that are against people's conscience whether they're pro-life or pro-choice. —Shane HazelDownload Print Quality (3840×2744)   |  Normal Quality (1920×1372) 274KB

Personally, I’m very pro-life, but I don’t think it’s a good idea to take money through force and coercion to fund things that are against people’s conscience whether they’re pro-life or pro-choice. —Shane Hazel

1447: Bob Murphy – Rent Control Creates Slumlords

If landlords can’t charge a market rate, they’ll cut corners to maintain profitability. Because rent controls encourage landlords to reduce their maintenance expenses, apartments in rent controlled areas aren’t painted as often, repairs aren’t made as quickly, graffiti doesn’t get erased as quickly, and the washer/dryers in the basement don’t get replaced when they break down. —Robert P. MurphyDownload Print Quality (7680×4020) 256KB  |  Normal Quality (3840×2010) 134KB
If landlords can’t charge a market rate, they’ll cut corners to maintain profitability. Because rent controls encourage landlords to reduce their maintenance expenses, apartments in rent controlled areas aren’t painted as often, repairs aren’t made as quickly, graffiti doesn’t get erased as quickly, and the washer/dryers in the basement don’t get replaced when they break down. —Robert P. MurphyDownload Print Quality (6146×7680) 294KB  |  Normal Quality (3073×3840) 167KB

If landlords can’t charge a market rate, they’ll cut corners to maintain profitability. Because rent controls encourage landlords to reduce their maintenance expenses, apartments in rent controlled areas aren’t painted as often, repairs aren’t made as quickly, graffiti doesn’t get erased as quickly, and the washer/dryers in the basement don’t get replaced when they break down.

Under rent control, there are no market penalties for shoddy service because there is a long line of potential tenants. Thus rent control does not eliminate but rather creates “slumlords” who in a market system would have to compete to attract and retain tenants.

—Robert P. Murphy

1446: Ayn Rand – If Capitalism Never Existed

If capitalism had never existed, any honest humanitarian should have been struggling to invent it. But when you see men struggling to evade its existence, to misrepresent its nature, and to destroy its last remnants—you may be sure that whatever their motives, love for man is not one of them. —Ayn RandDownload Print Quality (3840×2010) 1.44MB  |  Normal Quality (1920×1005) 192KB
If capitalism had never existed, any honest humanitarian should have been struggling to invent it. But when you see men struggling to evade its existence, to misrepresent its nature, and to destroy its last remnants—you may be sure that whatever their motives, love for man is not one of them. —Ayn RandDownload Print Quality (3840×2744) 1.84MB  |  Normal Quality (1920×1372) 236KB

If capitalism had never existed, any honest humanitarian should have been struggling to invent it. But when you see men struggling to evade its existence, to misrepresent its nature, and to destroy its last remnants—you may be sure that whatever their motives, love for man is not one of them. —Ayn Rand

1445: Bob Murphy: Discrimination in the Free Market

If an employer has an opening that pays $50,000 in salary, and the Christian applicant will bring in $51,000 in extra revenue to the firm while the Muslim applicant will bring in $55,000, then to discriminate against the creed of the latter will cost the employer $4,000 in potential profits. Discrimination is automatically “fined” in the free market. — Bob MurphyDownload Print Quality (7680×4020) 211KB  |  Normal Quality (3840×2010) 118KB
If an employer has an opening that pays $50,000 in salary, and the Christian applicant will bring in $51,000 in extra revenue to the firm while the Muslim applicant will bring in $55,000, then to discriminate against the creed of the latter will cost the employer $4,000 in potential profits. Discrimination is automatically “fined” in the free market. — Bob MurphyDownload Print Quality (7680×7680) 285KB  |  Normal Quality (3840×3840) 152KB

If an employer has an opening that pays $50,000 in salary, and the Christian applicant will bring in $51,000 in extra revenue to the firm while the Muslim applicant will bring in $55,000, then to discriminate against the creed of the latter will cost the employer $4,000 in potential profits. Discrimination is automatically “fined” in the free market. — Bob Murphy

1444: Johnny Adams – Censorship is About Control

Censorship is really about the state being afraid of the ideas of liberty; they're afraid that it might catch on and that they will lose all control. —Johnny AdamsDownload Print Quality (3840×2010) 6.59MB  |  Normal Quality (1920×1005) 313KB
Censorship is really about the state being afraid of the ideas of liberty; they're afraid that it might catch on and that they will lose all control. —Johnny AdamsDownload Print Quality (3840×2744) 8.75MB  |  Normal Quality (1920×1372) 412KB

Censorship is really about the state being afraid of the ideas of liberty; they’re afraid that it might catch on and that they will lose all control. —Johnny Adams

1443: Gene Epstein – The Evils of Capitalism

The evils of capitalism are simply the evils of social trends and the evils and the misdeeds of human beings. We are going to misbehave; there will be evil in the world. Capitalism is, by far, the best system for channeling human wishes and incentives into the best outcomes. —Gene EpsteinDownload Print Quality (3840×2010) 4.52MB  |  Normal Quality (1920×1005) 239KB
The evils of capitalism are simply the evils of social trends and the evils and the misdeeds of human beings. We are going to misbehave; there will be evil in the world. Capitalism is, by far, the best system for channeling human wishes and incentives into the best outcomes. —Gene EpsteinDownload Print Quality (3840×2744) 5.83MB  |  Normal Quality (1920×1372) 312KB

The evils of capitalism are simply the evils of social trends and the evils and the misdeeds of human beings. We are going to misbehave; there will be evil in the world. Capitalism is, by far, the best system for channeling human wishes and incentives into the best outcomes. —Gene Epstein

1442: Ron Paul – The Most Evil of All Taxes

The most sinister of all taxes is inflation. When you create money out of thin air to pay the bills, the value of the dollar goes down, and the poor and the middle class get hit with a higher cost of living. It is the most evil of all taxes. —Ron PaulDownload Print Quality (3840×2010) 2.13MB  |  Normal Quality (1920×1005) 199KB
The most sinister of all taxes is inflation. When you create money out of thin air to pay the bills, the value of the dollar goes down, and the poor and the middle class get hit with a higher cost of living. It is the most evil of all taxes. —Ron PaulDownload Print Quality (3840×2744) 2.94MB  |  Normal Quality (1920×1372) 259KB

The most sinister of all taxes is inflation. When you create money out of thin air to pay the bills, the value of the dollar goes down, and the poor and the middle class get hit with a higher cost of living. It is the most evil of all taxes. —Ron Paul

1441: Thomas Sowell – The Major Flaw in Politics

One of the big differences between economics and politics is that politicians are not forced to pay attention to future consequences that lie beyond the next election. An elected official whose policies keep the public happy up through election day stands a good chance of being voted another term in office, even if those policies will have ruinous consequences in later years. There is no “present value” to make political decision-makers today take future consequences into account, when those consequences will come after election day. —Thomas SowellDownload Print Quality (7680×4020) 202KB  |  Normal Quality (3840×2010) 111KB
One of the big differences between economics and politics is that politicians are not forced to pay attention to future consequences that lie beyond the next election. An elected official whose policies keep the public happy up through election day stands a good chance of being voted another term in office, even if those policies will have ruinous consequences in later years. There is no “present value” to make political decision-makers today take future consequences into account, when those consequences will come after election day. —Thomas SowellDownload Print Quality (6146×7680) 269KB  |  Normal Quality (3073×3840) 149KB

One of the big differences between economics and politics is that politicians are not forced to pay attention to future consequences that lie beyond the next election. An elected official whose policies keep the public happy up through election day stands a good chance of being voted another term in office, even if those policies will have ruinous consequences in later years. There is no “present value” to make political decision-makers today take future consequences into account, when those consequences will come after election day. —Thomas Sowell