1445: Bob Murphy: Discrimination in the Free Market

If an employer has an opening that pays $50,000 in salary, and the Christian applicant will bring in $51,000 in extra revenue to the firm while the Muslim applicant will bring in $55,000, then to discriminate against the creed of the latter will cost the employer $4,000 in potential profits. Discrimination is automatically “fined” in the free market. — Bob MurphyDownload Print Quality (7680×4020) 211KB  |  Normal Quality (3840×2010) 118KB
If an employer has an opening that pays $50,000 in salary, and the Christian applicant will bring in $51,000 in extra revenue to the firm while the Muslim applicant will bring in $55,000, then to discriminate against the creed of the latter will cost the employer $4,000 in potential profits. Discrimination is automatically “fined” in the free market. — Bob MurphyDownload Print Quality (7680×7680) 285KB  |  Normal Quality (3840×3840) 152KB

If an employer has an opening that pays $50,000 in salary, and the Christian applicant will bring in $51,000 in extra revenue to the firm while the Muslim applicant will bring in $55,000, then to discriminate against the creed of the latter will cost the employer $4,000 in potential profits. Discrimination is automatically “fined” in the free market. — Bob Murphy

1374: Walter Block – Youth Unemployment & Minimum Wage

	In 1948, white teenage unemployment in the U.S. was 10.2%, while black teenage unemployment was only 9.4%. This was when the effective minimum wage rate was much lower. Today, in a much less discriminatory epoch, but where teenagers are “protected” by a more stringent minimum wage law, white youth unemployment is 13.9%, while black youth unemployment is an astounding and shameful 33.5%. —Walter Block, The Case for Discrimination, 2010Download Print Quality (7680×4020) 228KB  |  Normal Quality (3840×2010) 114KB
	In 1948, white teenage unemployment in the U.S. was 10.2%, while black teenage unemployment was only 9.4%. This was when the effective minimum wage rate was much lower. Today, in a much less discriminatory epoch, but where teenagers are “protected” by a more stringent minimum wage law, white youth unemployment is 13.9%, while black youth unemployment is an astounding and shameful 33.5%. —Walter Block, The Case for Discrimination, 2010Download Print Quality (7680×7680) 315KB  |  Normal Quality (3840×3840) 148KB

In 1948, white teenage unemployment in the U.S. was 10.2%, while black teenage unemployment was only 9.4%. This was when the effective minimum wage rate was much lower. Today, in a much less discriminatory epoch, but where teenagers are “protected” by a more stringent minimum wage law, white youth unemployment is 13.9%, while black youth unemployment is an astounding and shameful 33.5%. —Walter Block, The Case for Discrimination, 2010

1367: Antony Davies – Laws That Harm the Disabled

In 1990, the U.S. government enacted the Americans with Disabilities Act. This law attempted to protect the disabled in the labor market by prohibiting discriminatory behavior on the basis of disability. A law specifically designed to ensure that the disabled got a fair shake in the labor market instead resulted in decreased employment rates for the disabled.

Why? There are a couple of reasons. First, the law made it expensive for businesses to hire the disabled. Regulators have deemed, among other things, that employers will need to modify an employee’s physical environment, offer the employee additional training, give him extra time to complete tasks, and even hire interpreters. All these things increase the cost of doing business.

Second, the law made it difficult to terminate disabled workers, even when warranted. But how is a business to prove that it terminated a disabled worker because of something other than the worker’s disability? The answer that many businesses seem to have arrived at, although few will admit it, is not to hire the disabled in the first place.

It turns out to be easier for an employer to prove that it did not hire a disabled worker for a reason unrelated to the worker’s disability than to prove that it fired the worker for such a reason. Consequently, the Americans with Disabilities Act actually led to a decrease in employment rates for the disabled.

—Antony Davies, James R. Harrigan

1224: Rob Schneider – Real Diversity Not Intolerance

When you hear people say they want diversity, remember there must be no exceptions. Their diversity must include diversity of thought, of ideas, and of opinion. Otherwise the defining principle of their ‘diversity’ is intolerance. —Rob SchneiderDownload Print Quality (3840×2010) 4.70MB  |  Normal Quality (1920×1005) 230KB
When you hear people say they want diversity, remember there must be no exceptions. Their diversity must include diversity of thought, of ideas, and of opinion. Otherwise the defining principle of their ‘diversity’ is intolerance. —Rob SchneiderDownload Print Quality (3840×2744) 6.26MB  |  Normal Quality (1920×1372) 284KB

When you hear people say they want diversity, remember there must be no exceptions. Their diversity must include diversity of thought, of ideas, and of opinion. Otherwise the defining principle of their ‘diversity’ is intolerance. —Rob Schneider

1145: Chris Cole – Family Law Court

I’ve never felt more like a criminal than when I was fighting to be a Father to my own children in Family Law court. —Chris ColeDownload Print Quality (3840×2010) 5.25MB  |  Normal Quality (1920×1005) 255KB
I’ve never felt more like a criminal than when I was fighting to be a Father to my own children in Family Law court. —Chris ColeDownload Print Quality (3840×2744) 7.00MB  |  Normal Quality (1920×1372) 325KB

I’ve never felt more like a criminal than when I was fighting to be a Father to my own children in Family Law court. —Chris Cole